Monday, February 16, 2009

Rudman on Emery

Brian Rudman shows his true bleeding heart colours with his piece in this morning's Herald on the Bruce Emery case - cop a read of this:

History is littered with examples of the fearful power of the mob. And of its irrationality and cruelty. It's the reason I've always resisted the superficial appeal of incorporating binding mass referendums as part of our democratic system. The groundswell of sympathy for 50-year-old Manurewa child-killer Bruce Emery on Friday after he was jailed for four years and three months for stabbing a 15-year-old tagger to death only reinforced my lack of faith in the wisdom of the mob.

Surely Emery is paying a very cheap price for someone who admitted running from his house with a 13cm kitchen knife in his hand, chasing the youngster down a street and extinguishing his life with a deadly thrust to his chest. Cheap when you think that 12-year-old Bailey Junior Kurariki, for instance, got locked up for seven years for the same crime of manslaughter - and he didn't even deliver any blows to his victim.


Now Rudman, of course, is perfectly entitled to his opinion. But as a journalist, he should make sure that what he writes is factual. Pihema Cameron was NOT a child. He was a young man, fuelled by a mix of testosterone, alcohol and cannabis, out late at night breaking the law. He was, to some extent, the author of his own misfortune. Cameron hardly behaved in a child-like manner. And let's not forget his emotive use of the term "deadly thrust". Evidence was given at trial that only 5cm of the 13cm blade penetrated Cameron's chest which hardly seems like a "deadly thrust" to us.

The comparison with Bailey Kurariki is also misleading. Kurariki was not an innocent bystander as Rudman infers. Kurariki was part of a group of young men and women who cowardly lay in wait and set upon Michael Choy with the purpose of robbing him. Not content with taking his money and his pizzas, they took his life as well.

We suspect that deep down, Rudman realises all this. But in his search for a hard-hitting column, he has resorted to hyperbole. Perhaps he should stick to his feud with Rodney Hide.

3 comments:

pdm said...

I am with you on this one INV2. Rudman's target, if he had to blame anyone. should have been the boys mother. Why did she allow her 15 year old son to get `blotto' on alcohol and drugs and go out tagging late at night. One suspects that was just `normal behaviour' for him aided and abetted by an uncaring mother.

What about his father - where was he.

Emery is a victim of that family - not the `cold blooded killer' some are now making him out to be.

Anonymous said...

Apparently,according to an early report, the father is a tetraplegic and the mother works/lives in Australia. Rudman is a disgrace to journalism, I always thought journalists were supposed to 'report' the news, not drown reports with their own personal (and biased) opinions which is the norm accross the MSM today.

Medusa

Anonymous said...

*across