Saturday, July 31, 2010

Labour gets nasty

Petulant, vindictive, nasty; all adjectives which could be used to describe the Labour Party today. The party heirarchy seems determined to rid itself of Chris Carter, and is prepared to play dirty to achieve its goal - the Dom-Post reports:

Labour is demanding Chris Carter resign and force a by-election as a concerted campaign gets under way within the party to discredit him over his mental state.

With Mr Carter's bungled plot forcing the spotlight on Labour leader Phil Goff, MPs moved yesterday to isolate the disgraced Te Atatu politician.

Mr Carter lashed out at Mr Goff as unelectable on Thursday after being unmasked as the MP behind an anonymous smear campaign.

Hutt South MP Trevor Mallard said Mr Carter's behaviour had been "pretty unusual" and "pretty irrational".

Party president Andrew Little also suggested people were concerned about Mr Carter, who had been under a great deal of stress over revelations about his travel and other expenditure.


We're not surprised that Labour has rolled out Trevor Mallard to verbalise its inner thoughts. Mallard is Labour's bully-boy, and seems to revel in the role. Mallard had a very cryptic post up at Red Alert last night entitled Once a Rainbow Warrior, but it has been pulled by him with a note that says "Friends found offensive".

You'd expect nastinessness from the likes of Trevor Mallard, but we were VERY surprised to read this, from Maryan Street:

And in an important signal the caucus was united behind Mr Goff's handling of the issue, Left-leaning list MP Maryan Street said Mr Carter had ended his political career "without a doubt".

"I'm actually very concerned about him. I've known him for 20 years. While he's often been a very volatile character, I've never seen him behave in such a self-destructive way before."


And Phil Goff makes Labour's motive plain:

He said Mr Carter no longer had a mandate to remain the Te Atatu MP.


Labour wants Carter to resign so that it can have a by-election (at a cost of $600k, if you believe Jim Anderton), and install a party hack to replace Carter, the former party hack. Unfortunately for Labour, Carter cannot be forced to resign. Chris Carter is the duly elected MP for Te Atatu, not Chris Carter, conduit of the Labour Party. And given his proclivity to live at the taxpayer's expense, we doubt that Carter will walk away from his MP's salary and associated benefits any time soon just to suit Phil Goff. The gloves are off!

Carter holds the moral high ground here. Unlike around half of his former caucus colleagues, he is an electorate MP, and is untouchable by the party, even if Labour expels him. There's already blood on the floor, but the Labour leadership seems as though it won't be satisfied until Chris Carter has been disemboweled, and his head delivered to Phil Goff on a silver platter. The personal attacks on Carter and the innuendo around his mental health reflect very poorly on Labour in our humble opinion.

9 comments:

alex Masterley said...

I think the term is "bitch fight"

Inventory2 said...

You might well say that Akex, but I couldn't possibly comment ...

pdm said...

One cannot help wondering how his Civil Union spouse and Local Electorate Chairman is going to deal with this.

Do Civil Unions dissolve by divorce?

CB said...

pdm - I think they go through an Uncivil Dis-Union.

Speaking of 'marriage', how is this for a defence for benefit fraud:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/couple-kept-sham-marriage-to-stop-violent-reprisals-20100730-10zt2.html

robertguyton said...

Why is no-one making light of Goff's claim that Carter has no mandate?

Inventory2 said...

Good question Robert. Do you think that a duly-elected electorate MP who is dumped by his/her party does still have a mandate?

Carter has a pretty strong argument that HE has a mandate, given the disparity between the electorate vote in 2008 which gave Carter a 5298 majority, and the party vote in Te Atatu which gave the Nats a slight majority.

Anonymous said...

Carter's actions were nothing short of treacherous.

However, someone he trusts (not Helen Clark) needs to get alongside him and both help him with well meaning advice, and make sure the pressure on him does not have serious health consequences. Brian Edwards could do this.

Remarks suggesting someone should "keep up their meds" are distasteful in any discussion, as is addressing people as "Wussell", or "Klark". Such debaters get the scroll button from me.

National needs to be cementing into place good policy while Labour is strong, not presenting sloppy policy because Labour is weak.

Unfortunately MMP delivers the very worst of politics, and decent people are turned off by the snideness and deceit (and the troughing).

Depending on who Labour selects to stand in Te Atatu, Carter will want to stand as an indepenent as defeated encumbent MP receive 3 months severance salary.

National needs to stand someone other than Tau Henare.

David

robertguyton said...

Invent - I think you missed my 'man date' punny thing, but maybe it wasn't so great.

Inventory2 said...

Far too subtle for a Saturday Robert ... perhaps if you'd said man-date the penny might have dropped.