Sunday, May 8, 2011

Of Bombers, Penguins and hypocrisy

Bomber Bradbury is all a-lather. He's blogged an open letter to the NZ Herald moaning about David "Cluster" Farrar being given a weekly column in that esteemed publication. He blogs:

Dear NZ Herald

Hi. How you doing?

Now I know in the past I've been a bit of a bitch about the NZ Herald.

I've teased you about your conservative bias, bullshit Journalism and the impression that Steven Joyce sub edits the entire newspaper for a very long time now, but being the largest daily newspaper in this country, you are all we have. You've been gracious enough in the past to print some of my letters and what you do sets the journalistic benchmark for the rest of the country, so I sincerely hope you listen to what I have to say, consider it and get back to us.

I'd like to question the appointment of the far right masquerading as right lite blogger David Farrar as your weekly columnist on politics. David Farrar is the unofficial mouth-piece of the National Party on-line and is a pollster for the bloody Government. Farrar has nothing more to add than massaged message points he's focus group tested on the National Party Research Unit!

That you want people with opinions is fantastic, and I applaud the widening of the political debate to include bloggers who are increasingly making their influence felt, but to hand a column over to the Government's number one propagandist without any balance whatsoever is just not acceptable from the largest daily Newspaper in the country.


We think Bomber doth protest too much. He seems to forget that his partner-in-crime on the hard left, Matt McCarten has been writing a column in the Herald on Sunday for like, well, ages! Of course Bradbury and McCarten have both been involved for some time in the formation of a new far-left party, which emerged last weekend, and is likely to vanish just as quickly.

So we'll cut Bradbury a little slack; he's obviously been far too busy unifying the forces of the extreme left to read McCarten's Sunday offering. We won't actually; we were being sarcastic!

Bradbury needs to drop the faux outrage. The left has any number of bloggers and commentators contributing to a range of publications. Two of those he mentions, Russel Brown and Chris Trotter are already published; by rivals of the Herald.

Bomber Bradbury is being a little bit hypocritical we reckon. He hasn't complained about the free rein that McCarten has been given to write provocative left-wing dogma, but now the arrival of The Penguin is just too much for him to bear. Harden up Bomber!

9 comments:

homepaddock said...

Well spotted, I2.

And did McCarten stop writing when he stood in Mana?

CB said...

Also, John Drinnan. It is written as a 'Media' column but is thinly disguised "I hate National bring back Helen".

jabba said...

maybe his Ritalin had finished and he forgot to top up

Anonymous said...

Only 1 hypocrite here. INV2.

Anonymous said...

As mat said in his column today.. I wasn't going to write about Hone today but............Left crap followed by left crap etc etc , a couple of years of column inches...bloody interesting eh!

Cheers
Lofty

The Gantt Guy said...

jabba got it right. Bradbury is like a 12 year old with ADHD, who forgot to take his ritalin. He can barely string a coherent sentence together, is constantly jumping up and down babbling on about something completely nonsensical trying to get someone to pay attention to him.

Why the Whale plays with him is completely beyond me. Bradbury is a fuckwit of the highest order who should have his microphone taken from him (apologies I2 - I know you're not so much with the adult language but in some situations, the epithet fits the criminal).

bobux said...

What is notable about Bradbury's output isn't his lunatic opinions or convoluted logic, but the astonishingly poor quality of writing.

Random capitals are inserted ("bullshit Journalism", "largest daily Newspaper") into the middle of sentences.

He alternates between singular and plural at whim -see the sentence "I sincerely hope you listen to what I have to say, consider it and get back to us."

The sentence being the largest daily newspaper in this country, you are all we have is a logical non sequitur. The Herald being the largest newspaper clearly implies there are smaller newspapers (or Newspapers, as he would put it), meaning the Herald isn't 'all we have'.

My own occasional blog comments contain plenty of typos and other blunders, but I don't have pretensions to being a political commentator. Nor do I spent my time telling newspapers (or Newspapers) how to conduct themselves.

bobux said...

And sure enough, that 'spent' in the final para should have been 'spend'.

The pedant's curse strikes again!

Anonymous said...

Polemical nonsense aside, the key difference is that there is at Sunday Star Times, a columnist who is from the left & the right. The Herald in contrast does not do this.

The fundamental problem is NZ reporting on the whole is lazy.

While this is unlikely change your opinion, I fundamentally believe in the value of objectivity in journalism - blogs to not to this and pander to their own prejudice and myopic worldview. The NZ Herald needs and MUST be better than that! You might see value in post-modern sophism I do not.