Todd McClay is the MP for Rotorua. He plans to introduce a Private Members' Bill to ban gang patches in government buildings. He writes:
Gang Insignia to be banned from All Government Buildings in New Zealand
National MP Todd McClay is to introduce a Members Bill to Parliament banning Gang Insignia from all government buildings in New Zealand.
"Wearing gang insignia in a Work and Income NZ or Housing NZ office, on the grounds of a public school or hospital will become a criminal offense" said Mr McClay, MP for Rotorua.
Mr McClay said that gangs serve no legitimate purpose in NZ society. They run much of the drug trade and are involved with organised crime. Intimidating behaviour by gangs will not be tolerated, he said
“Everyday members of the public seek assistance from government departments. Law abiding citizens deserve to be protected from intimidation and threat when they visit government buildings. When people work for the government they have the right to be protected from the harm that gangs do,” he said.
"My message to gangs in this bill is clear. If you walk into a Work and Income office wearing a patch, the government will not serve you. Instead, a policeman will arrest you."
Mr McClay said that the National Government had passed a raft of legislation to target gang activity. This Bill is another step towards toughening up on gangs and sends a clear message to gang members whose purpose is to inflict misery and harm to individuals and communities.
Mr McClay said that his bill was modelled on the Wanganui Gang Insignia Act passed by Parliament in 2009 when Michael Laws was Mayor of Wanganui.
Any gang member who wears gang insignia in a government building will face a fine of up to $2000 with the insignia destroyed.
“Gang members wear their insignia as a badge of pride. It gives them arrogance to intimidate law abiding members of the public. Patches identify the wearer as a member of a criminal organization who has most likely committed crimes to earn the right to display a gang patch. This is appalling and there is no place for it in Work and Income NZ, Housing NZ offices, or any other government building in this country,” he said.
Mr McClay said “For those who are concerned about civil liberty I will always put the needs of victims and government employees before the rights of gangs whose sole purpose seems to be to harm others, commit crimes and manufacture and sell drugs to our children.”
Todd McClay MP
Member of Parliament for Rotorua
The tide of public opinion is turning against gangs. Communities have taken note of Wanganui's bylaw, and a number of towns and cities are drafting their own.
More importantly, politicians are now taking a stand against gangs. We commend Todd McClay on this initiative which we reckon is definitely worthy of introduction, First Reading and a Select Committee process. We agree with McClay when he says that gangs serve no legitimate purpose.
Better still, we'd love to see the government adopt McClay's still-to-be-introduced Bill as a government measure so that it doesn't languish in the ballot and have to pass through the tortuous Member's Bill process.
So well done Todd McClay; this is a tremendous initiative. And for those who worry about civil liberties, we repeat his closing comment, which we agree wholeheartedly with:
Mr McClay said “For those who are concerned about civil liberty I will always put the needs of victims and government employees before the rights of gangs whose sole purpose seems to be to harm others, commit crimes and manufacture and sell drugs to our children.”
15 comments:
Todd's a toff and twitty with it.
Even Lindsay Mitchell sees his gormlessly conceived bill for what it is - worthless.
Go read her comments Inv2 (I covered it as well - nothing worthy about McClay's idiotic attempt to 'stamp out gangs' at all.)
Waste of space, that fellow.
Sounds to me like a typical worthless election year gimmick.
I disagree with Lindsay Mitchell's assessment Robert, and I disagree with yours, without resorting to personal abuse. Gangs are evil, and have no place in a civilised society. Wanganui, even though the gang patch ban is currently in limbo, is a far more pleasant place; the gang patch ban has had a significant effect, and council will soon restore it is a slightly more tightly-focused manner.
Gang patches are a very significant part of gang identity, and banning their wearing has had a signifcant impact on both overt gang activity and presence, and gang-related crime. As I said in my post, this proposed Bill is well worth scrutiny from a select committee and input from the public.
Then you have it wrong Inv2, probably because your emotions are clouding your judgement.
How's the first 'Laws' patch ban going btw?
Oh I see your 'limbo' comment.
Poor effort that. Faulty logic led to it being tossed.
Good thing.
Fear not Robert; thanks to our Green mayor Annette Main actually seeing that there had been tangible benefits (a 15% decrease in gang crime in less than 12 months), the bylaw is presently being re-drafted, and it will be back on the books within a few months. The Court of Appeal decision was only about the manner in which the by-law had been applied; the Court did not find against the spirit and intent of eitjher the bylaw or the Gang Insignia Act. Those Robert are facts, not emotion.
"and it will be back on the books within a few months"
You sound confident Inv2!
Can you predict other things with equal surety?
IV2, your blog to RG seems as a blanket is to shit.
@ Robert; yes, I am confident. Council has taken advice on the Court of Appeal decision, and it is on that basis that the bylaw will be redrafted. I have no doubt whatsoever that Council will pass it once again, despite the change of leadership.
This link may interest you Robert:
http://www.wanganuichronicle.co.nz/local/news/here-we-go-again-council-to-rewrite-gang-patch-byl/3944334/
Ms Main said she was not initially in favour of banning gang insignia but realised that Wanganui people had embraced it.
"We need to send a strong message to the community that people can continue to feel free from intimidation in public places."
I applaud Annette Main's willingness to admit to changing her mind.
@ Adolf; I couldn't possibly comment ...
Adolf - implying that Inv2's blog is a shit-covered blanket is most unkind.
Inv2 - it's no such thing. At times it's quite interesting though some of your commentators (see above) are a little indelicate.
Actually Adolf, I prefer the suggestion that RG is to Keeping stock, as Penny Bright (Phil Ure, Redbaiter....)is to Kiwiblog!
Like Inventory I applaud every endeavour to combat the extreme evil of gangs. I generally agree with and admire the diverse abilities of Lindsay Mitchell but I can't figure out where she comes from on this issue.
Is a state house, a goverment building
Apparently not Anon.
Post a Comment