“Labour has advised the commission that it will abide by the commission's interpretation of the legislation. It has withdrawn the pamphlet from circulation, along with another similar publication. Between now and the election, it will apply a wide interpretation of the phrase 'election advertisement', and include formal promoter statements in the terms recommended by the commission on all such material.”
It was reassuring to hear a Labour front-bench MP confirm that Labour would be more careful going forward, and that it would comply with the Electoral Commission's interpretation. There's just one problem; no-one reads Labour Party pressers!
WhaleOil blogs:
After my post yesterday asking for examples of rule breaking to be sent in I can now confirm that Labour, contrary to their promise to the Electoral Commission has continued to send out their illegal brochures.
These brochures were received today in his mailbox in West Auckland. My tipster writes:
Saw your post on the blog asking for copies of items received. Attached are scans of items I received in the past 3 days in my letterbox in west auckland.
The image with the scenic view I received 2 copies of in 2 days and the other 2 images of the food baskets comparisons I received today.
Labour has deliberately lied to the media, to the Electoral Commission and to the New Zealand public. They issued their press statement promising to stop sending out illegal brochures on 9 July. The brochure was delivered yesterday 20 July, some 11 days later. This cannot be a mistake, it has to be a deliberate flouting of the rules.
I will now lay another complaint with the Electoral Commission about Labour’s continued breaking of electoral law.
Oh dear. WhaleOil have been in grievance mode recently,. He has complained twice to the Speaker, and also to Chief Electoral Officer Robert Peden about alleged abuses of the law or parliamentary procedures by Labour MP's. Now it would seem that another complaint is about to land in Mr Peden's in-box.
It's one thing bleating about unfair play or illegal campaigning on the blogosphere or via social media sites. But we commend Cameron Slater for referring these allegations to the proper authorities so that they can be properly investigated, and so that sanctions can be imposed if it is found that the law has been broken.
We agree with Cameron Slater on another issue too. In this case, it's the Labour Party which is alleged to have been found with its hand in the public cookie-jar. But if other parties, National included indulge in similar rorts, we will encourage them being investigated by the relevant authority. No party or individual is above the law.And after all, it's OUR money that they are wasting!
14 comments:
So, so boring....
snore
Makes a change from your normal "Look; over there!" style Robert.
I take it that your lack of interest means that it's ok in your view for political parties of any hue to rort Parliamentary Services in contravention of electoral law.
snore
The arrogance of the "born to rule" left is evidently boundless. Interesting that the swamp dweller from the sub-Antarctic doesn't have anything approaching a defence to Labour's criminality."Mindless" can be added to the attributes of the left.
Faversham
"The arrogance of the "born to rule" left"
Too funny Faversham!
Too, too funny.
Must hoist myself up onto the chaise lounge, toss back a ginny and chortle for 5 or 6 minutes over your jolly jape!
Chaise *longue*...you know, with a hard 'g', French for 'long chair'. I though you lefties prided yourselves on your intellectualism? The guru of Riverton caught on an ignorant Americanism! Oh the shame!
I checked it first James and didn't go for the snob's version.
Color me rough 'n' ready.
Btw - Do you ride a bicycle or a bike?
I agree if the electoral commission is not prepared to uphold their rules they should either abolish the rules or abolish their commission. I prefere the second option.
I seek your indulgence for a moment Inventory2, as this is important, and Robert is here (and bored).
A day or two ago I gave some public service advice to Murray Thomichovich regarding being registered on the Electoral Roll.
This advice was described by Robert Guyton thus:
"Your concern for Murray is exemplary and the smarminess of your condescending advice as unctious as can be found anywhere!"
Now if I respected Robert's opinion about anything then I could have felt wounded. Fortunately, that was not the case, but I did wonder whether my gut instinct could have been wrong. Murray told us that he is a businessman who is not interested in politics. Sometimes busy people, such as Murray, put off checking up on these things and miss the opportunity to record a vote on Election Day because they are not on the Roll.
Today, whilst in my local library, I took the opportunity to check for Murray, as he may not have been back on one of his rare visits to your blog, and missed my entreaty to him. Well, Murray is not on any of the rolls covering the Taranaki region, so I urge him to pop into his local Electoral Office and sort it out with them pronto.
Should he pop over to your blog, Robert (and it looks as if not many do), perhaps you could urge Murray to enrol, especially as he holds very similar views to your own.
David
Indulge to your heart's content David,given that you had the courtesy to ask permission. If only others displayed the same level of courtesy towards their hosts, the blogosphere would be a far more salubrious place.
David - you are awfully gullible.
"Murray Thomichovich" is clearly a pseudonym. You ought to have been able to tell that at a glance, as I did. Your naivety, while cute, marks you as a novice in the field of blog commentary and the effort you went to following up on 'Murray' confirms this. I can help. Ask me before you expend time on such wild-goose-chases. I'll help you decide what's what and what's not.
Goodness Inv2- you do attract them!
Is RG admitting that Murray's is a "fair cop?"
Cadwallader
RG never admits to anything Cadwallader. He's only here to stroke his own ego and to shit-stir, if you'll pardon the phrase. You ask him questions and he obfuscates and/or abuses, but he seldom answers. It's all about him.
Cad - 'Murray' is not a pseudonym of mine if that's what you mean. Like me though, you can probably tell he's someone's. Probably Santa's but far be it from me to accuse someone of posting under a name not their own.
Post a Comment