Monday, August 8, 2011

Oh Trevor: another SMOG!

Over at Red Alert, Trevor Mallard is trying to copy WhaleOil's amusing and highly topical Txts from New York series. We won't dignify this plagarism with a link, but suffice to say that it's not a patch on the original.

And he's getting a roasting too; here's a selection from the smorgasbord of comments:


  • The Baron says:

    I cant decide what makes this so tragic – the plagiarism or how horribly unfunny it is?

  • Si says:

    @Whafe, I suggest you look up the definition of original. It’s a good job Trevor didn’t post this next month, he could have been prosecuted under the Copy Right Infringment bill.

  • Inverness says:

    Why dont you concentrate on what your paid for Trevor.
    That is to represent the few Labour supporters left.
    Leave the comedy to unemployed activists , which is what youll be soon if you dont raise your game

  • annie says:

    It’s not copying another blogger I object to so much as the clumsiness of the effort. C-


Poor Trevor. He hasn't had a good last few weeks. There was a dreadful month of polls after Labour's game-changing tax policy was released, Labour got ambushed on its filibuster last week, and to add insult to injury, Lockwood Smith twice described Mallard's questions and points of order as "inept", which they were.

It's not going to get better any time soon either. The August polls will soon start to filter out, and then of course there's the Great Cycle Challenge on Sunday 21 August when we might just happen to be in Auckland! After that the Rugby World Cup begins, and somewhere amongst all his other preoccupations (including blogging and tweeting), he has Labour's General Election campaign to manage.

Let's hope that Trevor and Labour have some original ideas come the election. In the meantime Cameron Slater will doubtless be reflecting on how imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!

He shoots; he scores! It's another SMOG (Social Media Own Goal) for Trevor Mallard!


UPDATE: Just to continue with the footballing theme here, John Harteveld from Stuff puts the boot in:

Sigh. Another day and the Labour Party takes yet another turn for the cringe-makingly desperate. The party's chief strategist, their sharpest political mind and the chap responsible for winning the election campaign has this morning come up with this rather lame attempt at humour.

Trevor Mallard's theft of an overused and not terribly funny concept from a right-wing blogger is just a bit sad.

If it was an isolated example of an odd attack on the PM, it wouldn't rate a mention.

But ever since the intellectual excitement and esprit de corps that accompanied Labour's tax policy announcement died down a fortnight ago, a steady drip feed of rather juvenile stunts - many of them played out unthinkingly online - has been issued from a few in the Labour caucus.

Mallard and the Dunedin South MP Clare Curran are the chief mischief makers. A missive from Curran last week seemed to subtly encourage readers to make some sort of a link between John Key and the 1991 US invasion of Iraq, on the grounds that a PR company hired by Tourism NZ to secure a spot for Key on the Letterman show was the same firm that had been criticised for its role "as mastermind for the Kuwaiti campaign''. Good grief.

Oh dear; oh dear; of dear ...

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please don't come to Auckland.

jabba said...

I will do all I can to go and watch .. the thing is of course, will Mallard turn up

Anonymous said...

"No ghost; he’s been made to look like a pillock again by trying to copy something, but failing to make it funny. If this is indicative of Labour’s election campaign tactics, I truly despair."

My God (and yours too possibly INV2) you're like a blowfly to the rotten meat. Not an ironic bone in a conservative christian's body is there? Failing to make it funny... like a particular depressed right wing extremist blogger you mean? (Is there more than one of those????) I think you've missed the point. And that IS depressing... God forgives, though, so all will be well.

Lauren said...

Something to raise the negative unchristian tone here at this nasty keepingstock blog into one that is actually worthwhile for people:

http://www.wisdomcommons.org/virtue/151-optimism/essays

jabba said...

it seems that blogs like Keeping Stock, who follow politics are going to be hit by those who attack the messenger, not the message .. yawn

Inventory2 said...

It happens Jabba; it goes with the territory. When they attack me, it means that they've lost the argument.

Hope to see you at the Great Cycle Challenge on the 21st. Anon 12.57pm won't be happy, but Auckland's a big place...

jabba said...

I will be in my Wanganui jersey showing the Whale support from the little cities/Towns. I guess the race was never going to be in Palm Nth as Daffy may have Wainui supporters turn up (if he has any that is).

Inventory2 said...

Unlikely Jabba; remember that motel in Palmy North that banned punters from Wainuiomata?

Anonymous said...

Not here to argue. Here to reiterate the paucity of integrity at this blog. And also here to provide balance and reason. Although, if religious people knew how to reason there would be no religion. It makes sense and is entirely reasonable and I'll bet you your supernatural god versus my natural universe that you have no 'argument' against it...

Inventory2 said...

@ Anon (7.07pm) - the blog doesn't exist to ram my faith down anyone's throat. If you want to comment sensibly on my choice of subjects, you are more than welcome. If you want to push your beliefs (to which you are absolutely entitled) and ridicule mine, don't bother.

Sebastian said...

Looking forward to catching up at this public event and at the post-race function. I'll have my HD camera there and hope to post pictures of all my blogosphere mates with some pithy accompanying captions. Maybe RG will be there on his cycle too?

Regards, Sebastian.

xxoo Tarns said...

Good point INV2 get ova yrself anon.

Im christian with no beliefs only learned customs which I'm happy 2 change when shown they are wrong (like condom thing for africa cathlics). we don't need people like you here anon with your silly reason. what you on about?

I reckon it's time 2 turn off anon comments.

xxoo Tarns

Ciaron said...

Anon 7:07. If you really think you've got Christianity de-bunked, try your argument here and let us know how you get on.

johnny said...

@Ciaron. When fashioning an 'argu-ment' (as is the wont here it seems), it would be best not to hyphenate words that don't require it, it rather debunks your own message. Is that counted as a S.M.O.G? There seems to be a creepy delight in such things around here.

The link you provided doesn't work. (Possibly because my IP address has been illegally fiddled with?) It took me to a website written by someone with no idea. I was looking forward to an insightful and reasoned piece of satire. Where people don't have to write /sarcasm to illustrate they've been sarcastic, or say 'with tongue in cheek' to somehow justify their meanness and unchristian intentions. Like this blog.

Thanks to you, I and many others have just sicked up a little onto our political hymn books. Ironically the captcha for this was 'doorag'.

johnny said...

@Ciaron. Clicked on your profile and discovered you follow the CrusaderRabbit blog. This has left me wanting to scrub myself with a steelo. Please ignore my previous comment. I don't want to engage with anyone of your ilk, even to 'de-bunk' your violent and paranoid fantasies. Awful stuff, pal. INV2, I'm surprised your brand of xtianity allows collusion with such obviously twisted templar worshipers... are you one of them???

Ciaron said...

Don't be obtuse Johnny. Put your money where your mouth is and go toe to toe with Glenn if you think your argument is so good. I look forward to your report.

Inventory2 said...

@ Johnny; thanks for your comments. No; I'm not a regular visitor to Crusader Rabbit, and you'll note that blog doesn't feature on my blog-roll. As for IP address tampering; not me; as you may have seen me state on many occasions, I'm not a techie, and wouldn't even know where to start.

As I've stated before, I welcome a range of views, as long as people stick to the subject.

johnny said...

Why would I argue with someone who uses a beretta and the tagline 'meet my little friend' as their logo?
It's not a philosophy I could even imagine giving oxygen. Upon reading some of his prose (and many of his sycophantic evangelist commenters) I'd suggest circular logic is alive and well. Here's a brilliant example of his philosophy (INV2 apologies for using your thread but Ciaron has rather taken up your mantle)
"God also can’t build a skyscraper that’s so high that he can’t jump over it. These are not clever, profound or interesting objections to the doctrine of omnipotence, and if you think they are, kill yourself."

A charming propensity towards dismissive language and violent action that seems de-rigueur at many right wing religious political blogs.

Ciaron said...

I think you are rather missing his point. The very fact that you are unwilling to display this awe-inspiring argument of yours leads one to suppose that it only exists as a figment of your own self-righteous imagination.

johnny said...

Ummm, all my posts say I've nothing to argue.
And, by the way, one can't argue with irrationality.

'leads one to suppose that it only exists as a figment of your own self-righteous imagination.'

Now that you've cleverly – although perhaps unwittingly (unless you're a fraud) undermined religion and all religious dogma, perhaps a RATIONAL DISCUSSION is possible...

Oh, I forgot you're aligned with Templar Bunny and its nefarious ideological lunacy.
As you were.

Ciaron said...

Say, you're not Dick Dawkins perchance?