Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Just for Robert G...

Robert Guyton worries a lot about us, which is both touching, and a little bit discomforting. But he was especially worried about us yesterday when he typed out the first comment on the post LAUDING Sir Peter Leitch for his philanthropy, accusing us of a series of attack posts.

Like any good blogger would, we've taken his words on board, so this post isn't going to attack anyone or anything. It's just going to be a post which exists for its own sake, and is dedicated to Robert because he cares.

Boy; we feel so much better after that. It's going to be a wonderful day...thanks a whole bunch Robert for changing our outlook on life!

8 comments:

robertguyton said...

You're welcome Your Majesty.
Better yet, walk away from your keyboard for the day. Go outside and smell the rurality. Think green thoughts. It's very reviving. I'd do the same, in the hope that we could establish some sort of like-mindedness across the divide, but I'm jammed into my councillor's chair today, wrestling with issues of water quality and effluent, so you'll have to do it solo. Watch out for electric fences and bolshy bovine mums.

robertguyton said...

But ponder, while you're out there, the latest poll that shows Labour improving, National slipping and Key's popularity eroding!

gravedodger said...

Sort of, like, 'green' mud wrestling Robert.

Inventory2 said...

We'll do the next best thing Robert; work from home, with our new-found rural outlook. We might take tea in the orchard though...

PM of NZ said...

"worries a lot about us"

Unlike myself, more like he sees you as one could be converted to the dark side that is the Greens.

I'd definitely say "a little bit discomforting".

Inventory2 said...

No chance of that PM; I like the good life too much, and the mere thought of becoming a vegetarian fills me with dread...

Sthn.Jeff said...

Why is it my eyes glaze over whenever I start reading anything by Robert?

robertguyton said...

Sthn.Jeff - because you have a short attention span?
Can't follow a good argument through to it's logical conclusion?
(Lost you at the first sentence I know, Jeff, but maybe, just maybe you hung in there...)