Wednesday, October 26, 2011

No launch for Labour

We're not quite sure what to make of this; the Herald reports:

The Labour Party has broken from tradition by deciding not to have an official campaign launch this year.

It will instead mark the start of its campaign in a low-key way - with a policy announcement on savings to media tomorrow in its own caucus room.

The decision not to have a launch event is unusual - the events are considered to provide valuable media and television coverage of a leader speaking to an audience of supporters in the lead up to the election.

The National Party will hold its event on Sunday in Auckland and is expected to focus on Prime Minister John Key.

By contrast, Mr Goff does not feature on any of the party billboards although he does front most of the television advertisements.

Campaign spokesman Grant Robertson said the party wanted to focus its campaign on the policy differences between the parties, rather than a popularity contest.


Is this a tacit acknowledgement by the Labour Party that Phil Goff is unelectable as leader? Or is it perhaps a sign that Phil Goff is not going to figure much post-26 November?

Whatever the explanation, it seems highly odd that Labour has canned its campaign opening. And Grant Robertson is at least candid about the task Labour faces:

He denied it was an attempt to keep Mr Goff - who is struggling to poll well as preferred Prime Minister - out of the public eye. He said Mr Goff was in the television advertisements and would be in the leaders' debates.

"I think everybody can see John Key is an extremely popular Prime Minister. But we want New Zealanders to know they've got a clear choice here, and it's a clear choice about policies."


We agree; there IS a clear choice about policies. Voters can choose between National's less-is-more approach, and see the economy return to surplus in 2014-15. Or they can choose Labour's borrow-and-hope policies, most of which are uncosted, and see the record deficit for the 2011-12 financial year exponentially exceeded over the next three years at least.

And in the meantime, we think that there's every chance that the phrase "We're not trying to keep Phil out of the public eye" will appear on a certain brand of beer's iconic billboards.


20 comments:

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

The silly buggers are unable to pay for a launch.

Or was it the Labour launch which sunk in the Sounds this morning?

Mayday Mayday Mayday

robertguyton said...

What a twisted interpretation of a situation, Pretzel Man.

Anonymous said...

What to make of it?
Policy over celebrity.
Gravity over clownishness.
Long term over short term thinking.
Competence over muddling.

John Key's the embarrassing uncle: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/blogs/what-s-he-said/5847475/Our-embarrassing-uncle

Anonymous said...

Can you launch a bathyscape..or do you just drop it over the side?

Faversham

CB said...

And even if they do win, Phil will last 3 months max before we have Andrew 'lotsahats' Little as our PM.

jabba said...

must be horrible for the Labour lot.
Saw Turei on telly this morning .. we need to see her more maybe, as a double act with Delaweirdo

Sir Loin said...

Pretzel man ?

Hardly think John Key muffing a hand shake with Richie McCaw is going to hurt is popularity. J.K. looks like he leads country, Phil Goff looks like a harried school principal.

The last time Labour had worthwhile policy Roger Douglas was the Minister of Finance.

Helen Clark & Michael Cullen spent like Botany mums at a Glassons sale ( or drunken Treasury policy wonks at The Whitehouse , you choose).

They drove down unemployment by increasing the size of the public service by 30%. The plunging productivity numbers over their rule reflected this saddling of the private sector with this burden of red tape & grubby little paper shufflers.

Inventory2 said...

@ Sir Loin; Robert thinks name-calling and silly jokes about peoples' ethnicity count for intelligent debate. I guess we should all just be grateful that he isn't on the Green party list.

pdm said...

Then again Inv - if RG was on the Greens list it might be enough to drop them below the 5% threshold.

jabba said...

bOb did try to be a Green MP but saw early on he had no chance so pulled the pin. Didn't like the idea of going past the Welcome to Riverton" sign .. way outside his comfort zone

homepaddock said...

Political parties usuallyt ake any opportunity for free publicity.

Maybe they're scared the only publicity would be bad.

jabba said...

homepaddock, you are in danger of bObby G accusing you of being a foreigner

robertguyton said...

Not 'accused' as being a foreigner, jabba, 'revealed'.

robertguyton said...

Shalom old friend.

Sir Loin said...

OK , Riverton , I see what Robert Guyton's malfunction is.

jabba said...

wow. bOb is now revealed as a chicken .. Homepaddock had spelling errors but no attack?? what's up bOb, cluck cluck cluck.
oh well, off to tennis

Sir Loin said...

Southland : 13% non white New Zealanders

Auckland : 48% non white New Zealanders

Makes sense of the strange racial / ethnic / cultural references.

Interesting that Christchurch is only 17%.

robertguyton said...

Sir Loin - Riverton's figures differ markedly from those of Southland.
A little knowledge, they say...

Sir Loin said...

So Robert your dislike of Jews & Germans is not typical in Riverton then ?

Not sure having a couple of jars of Chicken Tikka Masala in your local dairy makes Riverton ethnically diverse.

robertguyton said...

What leads you to the erroneous view that I 'dislike Jews and Germans', Sir Loin?
Just makin' it up, are you?