Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Welcome back to work David...

Over at Bowalley Road, Chris Trotter welcomes David Shearer back to work for the New Year. But it's probably not the kind of welcome that the new Labour Party leader was expecting; check this out:

WHY SO SILENT, Mr Shearer? Why has the Labour Party not voiced its solidarity with the Maritime Unions of New Zealand? Why have you not spoken out against the Ports of Auckland CEO’s outrageous threat to sack his entire workforce? What’s the matter with you, man?

The white sands and Pohutukawa blooms of Northland are beautiful at this time of year, and God knows you’ve earned a break, but you must know a politician is never truly on holiday. Time and the twenty-four-hour news cycle wait for no man.

The story unfolding on the Auckland waterfront has political implications far beyond the winning and losing of a single industrial dispute. Ultimately, it’s about whether or not the Labour Party stands for something more than an alternative set of political managers. And, if it does, then what, in the 21st Century, is that “something more” about?

You are fond of telling us, Mr Shearer, about that transformative moment in the Sudan when you looked over the side of the truck you were travelling in and witnessed half-starved children scrabbling in the dust for the scraps of food you had casually tossed away. It’s an arresting image: redolent with all the sub-texts of injustice, wealth and poverty, and the inevitable conflicts to which scarcity gives rise. And the clear implication of your story is that not only did you perceive the intrinsic moral squalor of the scene being enacted in the fly-blown Sudan dust, but that you decided then and there to do something about it.

It’s why you’re the Leader of the Opposition, Mr Shearer. Your United Nations “back-story” of “doing something” about poverty, war and injustice is what inspired your colleagues to make you, rather than David Cunliffe, leader of the Labour Party. An essential element of that back-story, in case you need reminding, was your celebrated Kiwi approach; your ability to get alongside all the parties involved in a conflict and help them identify the common-ground. It’s what you’re supposed to be good at.

So, I ask again: Why so silent on the Ports of Auckland dispute?

During Labour's selection process, much was made of David Shearer's "back-story", an expression that we hadn't heard used wisely previously to that. It would seem however that Mr Shearer's back-story has come back to bite him on the bum.

And Trotter speculates as to whom might be providing the new Leader of the Opposition with his strategic advice; read on:

Is it because you’ve been listening to Trevor Mallard, Mr Shearer? I sincerely hope not. Because Mr Mallard and his ilk are the very last people you should be listening to at the moment. They are, when all is said and done, the people who devised the campaign strategy which culminated in Labour’s worst election result in more than 80 years. The people whose political counsel is dictated by opinion polls and focus-groups. The sort of people who purport to lead by following. The people who would have asked those Sudanese children scrabbling in the dust which variety of scraps were their favourite.

Or, perhaps you’re recalling the example of “Side-line Stan” Rodger – Minister of Labour during the darkest days of Rogernomics. Mr Rodger made a virtue out of staying on the side-lines of industrial relations and refusing to involve the Government in settling strikes and lockouts.

And then comes the most stinging rebuke of all:

St Paul would have recognised the tactic. He recalled the time, before his encounter on the Road to Damascus, when he had held the cloaks of those involved in the hot work of stoning a Christian martyr. But, after Damascus (and the Sudan?) St Paul and you both understood that to stand on the side-lines while injustice is taking place is to participate in that injustice. If you opt to “hold the cloaks” of the Ports of Auckland management while they stone their own employees – then, damn you Mr Shearer, you’re as guilty as they are.

Chris Trotter closes by urging David Shearer to get down to the Auckland wharves, and show solidarity with the MUNZ members, who have just issued their sixth strike notice. This seems to us to be a very early test of Shearer's leadership, and of future relationships between Labour and the union movement.

How will David Shearer respond? The gauntlet has been thrown down by Trotter and by other left-leaning bloggers; will Shearer rise to the challenge, or will his silence on the Ports of Auckland dispute continue, and the strikes are doing.

6 comments:

Sir Loin said...

Of course, those of us on the right don't want David Shearer down at the docks throwing rocks at the scabs. It suits us that he is under attack from left wing blogs ( which for the average Kiwi voter is irrelevant).

If Shearer should be down at the docks cuddling the wharfies shouldn't Key be backing up the PoAL ? No, because it is not the role of goverment to get involved in private disputes. Len Brown is an exception because he represents the owners of the ports: the citizens of Auckland.

jabba said...

he told James Coleman he is keeping away as he can't do anything to sort the issue out. He wants to leave it to the parties concerned

Keeping Stock said...

That's a real vote of confidence for MUNZ then, isn't it Jabba; not! Are we to assume from that statement that Shearer doesn't have an issue with the way that PoAL is acting?

pdm said...

Hell Inv Robert Winter won't be happy

Anonymous said...

"No, because it is not the role of goverment to get involved in private disputes. Len Brown is an exception because he represents the owners of the ports: the citizens of Auckland."

... and David Shearer represents the unions.

CB said...

What is funny is that Shearer has probably experienced REAL poverty.
Imagine if you chucked mango skins to the poor here! They would go straight to old Joris claiming the throwers were racist.