Sunday, April 29, 2012

It just won't go away...

Sometimes in politics, stories take on a life and a momentum of their own. And the vexed question of David Shearer's leadership of the Labour Party is an example of that.

Since IrishBill blogged his concerns at The Standard ten days ago, it's been the politcal question on everyone's lips; how long has David Shearer got? Political journalists are openly posing questions now, and Tracy Watkins writes again on the subject this morning:

The left is divided over whether Labour's "unfortunate experiment" with David Shearer needs to end.
Some say Shearer has no leadership qualities, others that he is like Helen Clark early in her tenure.
Commentator Chris Trotter has labelled Shearer "the unfortunate experiment", saying he was wrong to support him. "He ain't anybody's kind of leader."
Academic Bryce Edwards agrees. "It's dragged on so long now that the honeymoon is over and there's nothing to show for it."
Speculation about Shearer's future was sparked by the departure of chief of staff Stuart Nash, known to have clashed with press secretary Fran Mold over the leader's low profile.
Nash's replacement is seen as an ally of deputy leader Grant Robertson, who is the leading contender to replace Shearer. Others touted are David Cunliffe, and former union boss Andrew Little. 

And although there are denials from within Labour, most of us who follow politics have been around long enough to be sceptical; read on:

Robertson yesterday reiterated he backed Shearer. "There is no truth to any rumour I am challenging him."
Cunliffe said he was "pissed off" at some of the speculation. "David is a good and decent leader who deserves a chance."
But Edwards said the speculation was "destabilising" and it was hard to imagine Shearer fighting to retain his role. "He's the sort of person who will quickly accept his fate."
Changing horses now risks reinforcing the view Labour is not ready to govern. 

This is indeed unfortunate for Labour. Parliament resumes on Tuesday, and the opposition should have the government on the run. But instead Mr Shearer will quite literally be looking to his right (Grant Robertson) and to his left (David Cunliffe) instead of across the foor of the House.

We think that it was the late Sir Robert Muldoon who made the comment about the enemies within your party being more dangerous than the enemies across the floor. As long as this issue drags on, Labour's effectiveness as an opposition will be blunted.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is simply not true. The rumours generated by your blogger mates are pure fantasy and put out there to try, desperately, to draw attention away from the multitude of FUBAR's the National Government is party to right now.
As you know, Inventory2.

Keeping Stock said...

You're delusional Anon; IrishBill once banned me from The Standard, so he's hardly my "blogger mate". But it was his post ten days ago that got the media interested.

And if you'd bothered to read Tracy Watkins' column yesterday, she confirmed that someone from within Labour's inner circle is leaking to Cameron Slater; who and why?

Keeping Stock said...

Vernon Small: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/6821304/Shearer-doomed-say-critics-on-Left

Tracy Watkins: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/6821564/Shearer-must-act-now

The latest leak, over outgoing chief of staff Stuart Nash's abrupt departure from Wellington on Thursday, should be what causes Mr Shearer the most sleepless nights. It appeared on right-wing blog Whale Oil within hours of Mr Nash's departure.

Fairfax had found out purely by chance only an hour or so earlier. The leak to Whale Oil was more deliberate, and according to people in the know, could only have come from either a very tight circle of senior staffers, or one or two very highly placed MPs.


Do you want me to go on? Who's pulling the rug out from under Shearer? Trevor Mallard perhaps?