Sunday, May 27, 2012

Another success...

The Sunday Star-times reports on another successful policy implementation:

Inmates are breathing easy following the prison smoking ban with scientists finding a greater than 50 per cent rise in air quality and – to everyone's surprise – no major incidents since the big stub out.
Smoking was banned in New Zealand prisons on June 1 last year with stark warnings from prisoners, prison advocates, and guards of riots and disorder.
However, there were no riots and Corrections staff report a number of unforeseen benefits.
Prison services assistant general manager Rachel Leota said prisons had reported a "calmer" environment with fewer "standover" incidents now that tobacco has been taken out of circulation.
Inmates had been heard on the prison telephone monitoring system telling family they appreciated living in a smoke-free environment and encouraging family to give up.
Prisoners had more money to spend on things such as phone cards, she said.
A team of scientists from Auckland University studying the amount of "fine particulate" in the air of prisons has found the rate halved after smoking was banned.
Dr Simon Thornley and colleagues set up an air quality monitor in Auckland Prison, at Paremoremo, and measured fine particulate concentrations for 15 days before and 15 days after the ban.
Readings were already low as the detector had to be set up in a staff area for safety concerns.
Before the ban the mean concentration was 6.58 micrograms per cubic metre of air.
This dropped to 5.17mcg once a ban on sale of cigarettes was introduced and fell further to 2.44mcg once the total ban was implemented. Thornley said despite the dramatic increase in air quality, the thing that surprised people the most was how well-behaved prisoners were while the ban was introduced.
"There were all sorts of preparations – extra staff, having riot gear available," he said.
Thornley credited the department for the long preparation time they had invested in the ban, communicating to inmates and helping them give up cigarettes.
"This is the most comprehensive prison ban we've seen [worldwide]," he said.
Because there was no possibility of having a cigarette, people seemed to be more able to accept it – similar to how even heavy smokers are able to handle long-distance flights without a cigarette.
"It seems the comprehensive ban is the most effective," he said.

And here comes the clincher:

"My sense is, a lot [of inmates] smoked because they were bored, and they could." Leota said there had not been a significant rise in contraband smuggling.

Isn't it great that prisons, a necessary evil even in the most civilised societies, are now healthier places without tobacco smoke. We have a friend who served a lengthy prison sentence due to a stupid choice he made. He did not smoke when he went to prison; he found it very hard to quit upon release. He told us that everyone smoked, because there was nothing else to do most of the time.

And all those who jumped the shark ahead of the ban will be feeling a little red-faced, such as this TVNZ example:

Prisoners have turned to nicotine patches as a means to get their fix ahead of a smoking ban.
From tomorrow, tobacco and lighters will become contraband at New Zealand prisons - a rule which is expected to affect seven out of ten inmates.
ONE News understands prison officers fear inmates will play up and cause problems in the country's jails when the ban comes into effect.
A former prison support volunteer, Rose Vailima, has warned the smoking ban will spark an uproar in prisons.
"There will be inmates rising up against other people, they'll be taking officers as hostages for things," she said.
"I haven't met one officer that's not fearful what this will bring, wishing it wasn't going to happen and fearing that some of them will be hurt."
A former Rimutaka prisoner, whose conviction was later thrown out, said he has spoken to friends who are still behind bars.
"I hear tension is running high .
"They're saying they're going to rebel, and that's all prisoners can do...they can only gang together and make a point and they'll make a point when they can."

Oh dear; So it's a hearty congratulations to the staff of the Corrections Department for their textbook implementation of the no-smoking policy, and to former Corrections Minister Judith Collins who pushed the policy through. They have proved the nay-sayers and prophets of doom wrong; again.

19 comments:

Pete George said...

Good to see the positives, and the lack of negatives despite doom predictions.

It's a bit like the banning of smoking in bars, that hasn't exactly wrecked our society.

And I also note the better atmosphere in the smoke free FB stadium in Dunedin - partly due to being smoke-free. It was very annoying getting stuck near a smoker at Carisbrook.

Last time I went to the stadium I noticed one person rushing out at halftime with cigarette in mouth and lighter poised in hand, but most smokers seem to have coped. And we're all better off for it.

Judge Holden said...

It's an appalling result for Peter Dunne's base! What's he going to do about it?

What do you mean "another" success? There's are others? You mean like the record number of NZers leaving for Australia, or the attempt to balance the books by taxing paper boys?

Pete George said...

I'm sure Dunne will be quite happy with this result. As will United Future party president Robin Gunston, who is National Director of the Prison Fellowship of New Zealand - I talked to him once about stopping smoking in prisons and from memory he was very supportive of it.

robertguyton said...

Pete George said:
"It's a bit like the banning of smoking in bars, that hasn't exactly wrecked our society."
That's hilarious from George! His fluffy-crowned boss, Peter Dunhill screamed blue-murder when the 'smoking in bars'legislation was proposed, declaring pompously, that it would ruin modern civilization as we know it!
Wot a larf you are, Pete!

Pete George said...

That's hilarious from Guyton, he doesn't seem to understand the concept that I speak for myself.

I don't really care what Peter Dunne said about smoking in bars - and there's that much crap thrown at him I don't believe anything without seeing proof - what I was talking about was now. And I always supported making bars smoke free.

Just because I have had an association with someone for a short time doesn't mean I have to discard all my history and take responsibility for theirs.

Judge Holden said...

"I'm sure Dunne will be quite happy with this result." Pete George crows. When it's pointed out that Dunne's practically a fulltime lobbyist for BAT, George squeaks, "I speak for myself".

Presumably he speaks for himself when he states he is sure of Dunnehill's opinion. Or something.

Anyway, George, are you saying you didn't even bother to find out about Dunn'es links to the tobacco and alcohol industries when you hitched yourself to his little wagon?

Pete George said...

JH - I didn't check back thirty years. I've looked at curreent UF policies and I'm happy with them. And recent speeches by Dunne sound reasonable, eg:

However, it is also important that we acknowledge the significant level of harm caused by legal substances.

Indeed, alcohol and tobacco, on a population basis, are the two most harmful drugs in this country.

In particular, tobacco is New Zealand’s most harmful drug and it is responsible for over 5000 deaths each year and around 90% of lung cancers.

Alcohol is also a significant preventable risk factor in the burden of disease for New Zealand.


Dunne supprts the status quo on the drinking age, so do I so no problem there.

I've heard all sorts of accusations directed at Dunne. Unless any are proven I will regard them as irrelevant. Some are blatant lies - I've disproven a few.

Keeping Stock said...

Gentlemen; this post wasn't actually about Peter Dunne; just in case you hadn't noticed...

Judge Holden said...

Believe it or not, posts about how great you think the National Party is occasionally need spicing up.

Judge Holden said...

Dunne has always adopted policy positions sympathetic to the tobacco and alcohol industries throughout his long and extremely boring parliamentary career. Can you spell out for us his position the smoking ban in bars and restaurants? Plain packaging? The drinking age? Lowering the BAC limit?

At the same time his attitude to other types of drugs is positively reactionary. Why could that possibly be do you think? His friends don't like competition perhaps?

robertguyton said...

Here's a goody on Peter Dunne, that I'm sure you will enjoy, Pete George.
Dunne was forced to admit in the House that he had used cannabis. This followed months of attack by Dunne on Nandor Tanczos for his support for the drug. Dunne, a pot-head! There's no great harm in that, in my view. It's the hypocrisy that counted against him then and continues to count against him now - asset sales, anyone?
As for your not knowing Dunne's past statements about tobacco, cigarettes and his opposition to any moves that limits their sale, where have you been, Pete? Under some rock somewhere?

Pete George said...

Holden and Guyton - your claims are unsupported by facts. In fact they are contradicted by facts.

For example, last year's bill on smoking (including in prisons), "Smoke-free Environments (Controls and Enforcement) Amendment Bill" - Dunne voted for that.

robertguyton said...

Dunne does as he is told.

Judge Holden said...

Can't answer my questions Pete?

Keeping Stock said...

Maybe he can't JH, or maybe he can't be bothered.

robertguyton said...

United Future leader and Associate Minister for Health Peter Dunne has admitted smoking cannabis in his hay days.

He made the confession to New Zealand Herald online readers on a live chat.

Mr Dunne spearheaded the campaign to push a ban on synthetic cannabis through Parliament.

He told readers he smoked cannabis as a student “a couple of times” back in the 1970s.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/9980956/dunne-tells-readers-he-smoked-cannabis/

Keeping Stock said...

@ Robert; are you REALLY suggesting that a person can't change their opinion on something like cannabis from when they were a student to when they are in middle age? Do you HONESTLY believe all the same things you believed when you were 20? I'm absolutely sure that I don't.

robertguyton said...

"
@ Robert; are you REALLY suggesting

(No, Keeping, I didn't suggest that at all)
that a person can't change their opinion on something like cannabis from when they were a student to when they are in middle age? Do you HONESTLY believe (No, Keeping, I didn't suggest that at all)all the same things you believed when you were 20? I'm absolutely sure that I don't.Dunne's typical of a born-again wowser. He had his fun, now he's going to stop anyone else having theirs.

Keeping Stock said...

Interesting approach Robert; just last year you were complimenting Phil Goff for having renounced his previous support of asset sales; I guess that made him a "born-again asset sales wowser". But now you're berating Peter Dunne for having changed his stance on cannabis from what it was perhaps 40 years ago. That doesn't seem especially consistent on your part...