Tony Ryall has put out a follow-up to yesterday's media release. Once again via Scoop, here 'tis:
Remember When – Part Two
Remember when Labour sold off Air New Zealand under urgency for $660 million to Brierley’s (65 per cent), and overseas airline companies Qantas (19.9 per cent), American Airlines (7.5 per cent) and Japan Airlines (7.5 per cent)?
Remember when – also in 1989 – Labour sold off Shipping Corp to ACT (NZ) Ltd? This $33.5 million sale was again pushed through under urgency – with no select committee process.
And remember – again in1989 – Labour sold Rural Banking Finance to Magneton Holdings for over half a billion dollars?
In just three years, Labour sold over 15 state assets for almost $10 billion to the highest bidders.
Who voted for these asset sales without telling the public about their plans at the previous election?
Phil Goff. Annette King. Trevor Mallard. And the rest of the Labour Party.
The same people who are now criticising the National Government’s mandated, long signalled, partial share offer to New Zealanders.
ENDS
Tony Ryall will again have given rise to blushes on the Opposition benches. Labour would love to be able to forget that it sold more assets than any other government (by dollar value) in the years 1984 to 1990. And once again, he has pointed out the shabby process that the Lange/Palmer/Moore government followed; no electoral mandate, the use of urgency and in some instances the complete absence of a select committee process.
It's little wonder that Labour is so keen to demonise John Key. He said that there would be no asset sales in the first term of his government, and there were no asset sales. National took its Mixed Ownership Model to the electorate in November last year, and received the highest share of the vote that any party has received in six MMP elections. And National is not trying to rush its legislation through under urgency.
There's another significant difference. National's plan will give individuals the opportunity to invest in our key assets. As we have previously noted, we will most certainly be looking to acquire a shareholding in Mighty River Power, which we will retain as a long-term investment, and hopefully pass dowen to our children as part of our estate. We hope that our Kiwisaver provider will invest on our behalf. And we know that a number of Iwi groups will look to make enduring, strategic investments that will provide an ongoing return for their whanau.
7 comments:
This morning I heard Steven Joyce and Jacinda Arden on NewstalkZB Mike Hosking's show talking about (PARTIAL) asset sales. Maybe Annette King should wise Jacinda up to speed about Labour's past asset sales. (This happened before Jacinda Arden's time.) By the way - what has happened to Annette King - is she not going to be on air with Steven anymore? Steven was very good this morning..............................
I'm interested (solely for academic purposes) to see if any of the Labour MPs who rail against asset sales today spoke for them in the '80s.
I perfectly respect the fact that neoliberalism is no longer Labour's preferred direction (and I don't much care for the "they did it too" justification for things), but I'm interested to see how Helen Clark, Trevor Mallard, Annette King and Phil Goff peddled the party line in Parliament. Research of the Hansards will be necessary.
Maybe Douglas was forced to rush those sales through parliament under urgency to prevent Labour's Left faction backbenchers speaking their mind...
Phil Goff most certainly supported the asset sales up to 1990 Joel. He was one of Roger Douglas' closest followers in the Lange/Douglas/Moore caucus.
This may help you Joel; worth a read in full, but here are a couple of extracts:
Socialist to Rogernome
Given Goff's views from those early years, onlookers could be forgiven for their puzzlement at what was to follow.
Goff's first term in Cabinet was at the power centre of Rogernomics and he was a strong advocate of many of the reforms. By the 2000s he was a key figure in another government, this time more strongly affixed to socialism, but his antipathy for the free market economy had dissipated to the extent that he now cites the free trade agreement with China as one of his greatest ministerial achievements.
Then - because he had long been considered the de facto leader of Labour's right - after he was made its leader in 2009, those expecting a step to the right were surprised when Goff went in the opposite direction instead.
And this:
But Goff was largely considered effective and was also popular with the public in polls at the time, ranking as the second most effective Cabinet minister after Moore.
Michael Bassett says Goff was "brimful of ideas" as well as being a strong advocate of the introduction of GST. He was clearly an "up-and-comer".
"Lange himself said to me in 1987 he expected Phil Goff to succeed him. If Lange had been able to stay another six or seven years from 1987, that was by no means an unreasonable expectation. I think a lot of people thought of Phil as a coming man."
Others also recall Goff as a convincing salesman of the Rogernomics reforms. MP Maryan Street was then involved with the party and said it was Goff who persuaded the Service and Food Workers' Union that GST was a good thing because it would raise more money to be used in health and education.
It was the vote of that union which later carried the GST motion at Labour's conference. Similarly, he managed to sell his student loan scheme to party members opposed to it. "He managed to persuade everybody that this was going to be the reincarnation of Michael Joseph Savage".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10746270
It's not difficult to find plenty more information that fingers Goff as a Rogernome.
Those who support Labour don't care about their hypocrisy.
Those who don't support Labour expect no better of them.
Joel, you may be correct ... except, of course the great and good Sir Roger Douglas had given way to Mr Caygill by the time most of the sales were finalised.
The sales were pushed through by Labour's left faction (with help from Prebs).
Gee. Ryall, who's not State Services Minister btw, must be desperate if the only reason in favour of the current round of asset sales is that the last time this was done it was an abysmal failure.
Post a Comment