Lance Armstrong has had enough. He is refusing to contest the doping charges that the US Anti-Doping Agency has laid against him; the Herald reports:
Lance Armstrong says he will no longer fight charges from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency that he used performance-enhancing drugs during his unprecedented cycling career, a decision that could put his string of seven Tour de France titles at risk.Armstrong says he is innocent, but announced today that he has decided against fighting USADA because he is weary of the doping accusations that have dogged him for years. His decision could lead to a lifetime ban from cycling and perhaps the loss of the Tour titles he won from 1999-2005.USADA says Armstrong used banned substances dating to 1996, including the blood-booster EPO and steroids, as well as blood transfusions. Armstrong sued in federal court to block the charges but lost.
And Armstrong has released the following statement on his website:
Lance Armstrong's Statement of August 23, 2012
AUSTIN, Texas - August 23rd, 2012 - There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a two-year federal criminal investigation followed by Travis Tygart's unconstitutional witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense.I had hoped that a federal court would stop USADA’s charade. Although the court was sympathetic to my concerns and recognized the many improprieties and deficiencies in USADA’s motives, its conduct, and its process, the court ultimately decided that it could not intervene.If I thought for one moment that by participating in USADA’s process, I could confront these allegations in a fair setting and – once and for all – put these charges to rest, I would jump at the chance. But I refuse to participate in a process that is so one-sided and unfair. Regardless of what Travis Tygart says, there is zero physical evidence to support his outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of controls I have passed with flying colors. I made myself available around the clock and around the world. In-competition. Out of competition. Blood. Urine. Whatever they asked for I provided. What is the point of all this testing if, in the end, USADA will not stand by it?From the beginning, however, this investigation has not been about learning the truth or cleaning up cycling, but about punishing me at all costs. I am a retired cyclist, yet USADA has lodged charges over 17 years old despite its own 8-year limitation. As respected organizations such as UCI and USA Cycling have made clear, USADA lacks jurisdiction even to bring these charges. The international bodies governing cycling have ordered USADA to stop, have given notice that no one should participate in USADA’s improper proceedings, and have made it clear the pronouncements by USADA that it has banned people for life or stripped them of their accomplishments are made without authority. And as many others, including USADA’s own arbitrators, have found, there is nothing even remotely fair about its process. USADA has broken the law, turned its back on its own rules, and stiff-armed those who have tried to persuade USADA to honor its obligations. At every turn, USADA has played the role of a bully, threatening everyone in its way and challenging the good faith of anyone who questions its motives or its methods, all at U.S. taxpayers’ expense. For the last two months, USADA has endlessly repeated the mantra that there should be a single set of rules, applicable to all, but they have arrogantly refused to practice what they preach. On top of all that, USADA has allegedly made deals with other riders that circumvent their own rules as long as they said I cheated. Many of those riders continue to race today.The bottom line is I played by the rules that were put in place by the UCI, WADA and USADA when I raced. The idea that athletes can be convicted today without positive A and B samples, under the same rules and procedures that apply to athletes with positive tests, perverts the system and creates a process where any begrudged ex-teammate can open a USADA case out of spite or for personal gain or a cheating cyclist can cut a sweetheart deal for themselves. It’s an unfair approach, applied selectively, in opposition to all the rules. It’s just not right.USADA cannot assert control of a professional international sport and attempt to strip my seven Tour de France titles. I know who won those seven Tours, my teammates know who won those seven Tours, and everyone I competed against knows who won those seven Tours. We all raced together. For three weeks over the same roads, the same mountains, and against all the weather and elements that we had to confront. There were no shortcuts, there was no special treatment. The same courses, the same rules. The toughest event in the world where the strongest man wins. Nobody can ever change that. Especially not Travis Tygart.Today I turn the page. I will no longer address this issue, regardless of the circumstances. I will commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities. This October, my Foundation will celebrate 15 years of service to cancer survivors and the milestone of raising nearly $500 million. We have a lot of work to do and I'm looking forward to an end to this pointless distraction. I have a responsibility to all those who have stepped forward to devote their time and energy to the cancer cause. I will not stop fighting for that mission. Going forward, I am going to devote myself to raising my five beautiful (and energetic) kids, fighting cancer, and attempting to be the fittest 40-year old on the planet.
Whether Armstrong's claims against the USADA are valid or not, we will leave to the experts. However his court case against the USADA failed, and had they been in breach of their own rules, one might have expected a US Federal Court to rule against USADA.
Lance Armstrong can rightly claim to be one of sport's most tested athletes. But equally; it is well known that professional cycling has been rife with a drug culture, and the USADA claims to have evidence of drug use by Armstrong from former teammates.
By refusing to participate in the hearing against him, Lance Armstrong is conceding the chance to put those allegations to the test, and to answer them once and for all. As much as we would all love to believe the back-story of the cancer survivor who became a champion many times over, the allegations of having had the smartest chemist will now forever hang over him.
We don't know if Lance Armstrong ever used performance enhancing drugs. The sportsman in us would love to believe him, but Armstrong's prolonged domination of the sport at a time when drug use was so prolific certainly rings alarm bells.
4 comments:
Prediction.This will become one of the great unsolved mysteries of sport
It pretty simple from where I stand.
Is he one of the most freakishly gifted endurance athletes of all time? Absolutely.
Is he one of the most meticulous and dedicated athletes of all time? No question there either.
Did that attention to detail cross the line into illegal methods? Balance of probability is yes, but beyond reasonable doubt? I wouldn't go that far.
He has most likely reached a point where he needs to put his family ahead of the never ending battles against the USADA. Armstrong makes some quite serious allegations against the USADA, and it wouldn't be the first US federal authority to overstep its boundaries in trying to prosecute someone.
I think the UCI have done a fine thing in supporting Armstrong. It is effectively a Salem witch trial - he has never returned a positive test, there are only rumours of positive tests, and a bunch of secret evidence that the USADA will not reveal.
He still came third after a three year break from the sport, knowing the massive scrutiny that he would be under. That is the mark of a true athlete.
Given virtually every other rider was doped up to the eyeballs on the Tour de France and he was beating them year after year, you'd have to wonder.
Post a Comment