And in his media release accompanying the detailed stuff, Bill English says:
Higher tax revenue, lower core Crown expenses and a large fall in annual Canterbury earthquake expenses helped to halve the Government's operating deficit before gains and losses to $9.2 billion in the year to 30 June 2012.
The Crown's annual financial statements published today show the Government is continuing to manage its finances responsibly and getting on top of debt, Finance Minister Bill English says.
"It was important that we helped New Zealanders through the recession by maintaining government programmes and public services," he says. "It was also important that we provided the financial resources needed to help the people of Canterbury after the earthquakes.
"That has meant running large deficits in recent years. However, that could not continue indefinitely. The consequences of too much government debt are all too clear in Europe and the United States, where we are seeing big cuts to public services and pensions, and higher taxes.
"The National-led Government does not want that for New Zealand. That's why we're running a balanced programme to build a competitive economy, to reduce the unsustainable growth in government spending of the previous decade, and to get back to surplus.
"The latest financial statements show the Government is making good progress, with the economy continuing to recover and public finances improving."
In the year to 30 June, tax revenue increased by $3.5 billion from the previous year, as the recovering economy underpinned consumption and wages.
Core Crown expenses fell by $1.4 billion due to a number of factors, including costs associated with the Emissions Trading Scheme and the weather tight homes financial assistance package.
Outside the core Crown, as reported previously the value of KiwiRail's rail-related assets was written down as a result of the company's restructure. Some $1.4 billion of the $8.6 billion devaluation was recorded as an impairment expense in the latest operating statement.
Overall, the operating deficit before gains and losses of $9.2 billion for the latest year compared with $18.4 billion the previous year.
When earthquake costs are excluded, the OBEGAL deficit was $7.3 billion in 2011/12, compared with $9.3 billion the previous year.
Whilst what has been announced today is a step in the right direction, especially the more than 20% fall in the OBERGAL deficit (after making allowances for earthquake-related costs), there is still much to be done. The high value of the dollar is hurting exporters, but that has more to do with the cash-strapped US economy than with ours. And the recovery from recession is still lukewarm. As retailers, we are not expecting a bumper Christmas.
A radical change of course however is the last thing that New Zealand needs. Our economy is out-performing those of many developed countries, and for that we should be guardedly optimistic. Getting back into surplus remains a priority for the Government, and that should be applauded.
We are headed in the right direction, and whilst there is still much to be done, today's results are better than most analysts were expecting. That is good news, but it can and should get better yet.
24 comments:
No analysis here, KS, just blind acceptance from Bill's media release.
The truth is not so pretty:
-The operating deficit is $4 billion greater than the budget forecast.
-Treasury officials refused to comment on whether we would reach a surplus in 2014-15 as predicted.
-There are still large costs related to the Christchurch recovery that are still to be determined.
-The costs of taking over the insurer AMI are double what was predicted and increasing
-The high value of the NZ dollar is continuing to squeeze exporters (despite a small drop in value) and the government is continuing to sit on its collective hands.
-The New Zealand Institute of Economic success predict a slowdown in the slight recovery over the second half of the year.
-The social consequences of the Government's austerity measures are continuing to bite and the $6-8 billion being spent to mitigate the effects of child poverty will continue to rise.
-The housing crisis is growing more extreme as property values begin to rise again and the Government continues to to shift responsibility for low cost housing to the private sector.
The fact that the economy survives at all is more to do with luck than good management. One of the few successful policies has been the Greens home insulation scheme (this has been acknowledged) and if more of our ideas had been supported we would be in a far better place.
The IMF regards our economy favorably but this is only in comparison to poor performances of most other countries. Our public debt was our major concern (mainly due to our overpriced property) and yet our government debt has risen from 30% of GDP to 75%. The fact that 75% still isn't as bad as others doesn't recognise the rapid rate of increase.
But we can dismiss your comments out of hand, bsprout, because you are a glass-half-empty socialist and Keeping Stock is a glass half full Tory, so he's right and you're wrong.
As for Bill English, he would never pick and chose his statistics and figures to paint a 'brighter future'.
Never, ever.
Dozy, the half full class can only be claimed because the halfway line has been drawn only a 1/4 of the way up the glass in the hope that no one notices. :-)
Where are the righties, celebrating this excellent 'news'?
Maybe they're busy watching the 6:00 news and Peter Dunne pimping legal highs and banning everything else.
I thought the rightwing were not keen on banning things?
this is great news .. imagine the mess we would be in with Red Russ as the Min of Finance .. home insulation, good grief, is that it bsprout?
Billy E keeps on winning Clutha/Sthland because the lame Gweens/Labour lot have no credible person to beat him
@ Hugh G.
Righties don't gloat.
Excellent news is the norm.
Will the Greens be able to get anyone to stand against Bill English in 2014, bsprout?
Jabba & R G, We had a young woman who stood against Bill last time and she almost doubled the Green vote. While Bill has a loyal following in Clutha Southland, there are rumblings amongst the National voters. I had some past staunch National voting farmers approach me for some Green Billboards and many are angry about the way National Standards was forced on their schools.
However, realistically I think Bill will continue winning Clutha Southland regardless of who we put up. Our strongest vote in the electorate comes from the Queenstown area and we are expecting it to grow after the concerns regarding the Fiordland Tunnel and monorail.
She doubled the vote to how many?
Who was the Green candidate the previous election?
It may be you had a chump the time before.
The Greens have replaced Social Credit as the repository of the protest vote.
Have your ex-staunch (kind of makes them non-staunch)National voters gone organic? Refused to use PKE? Or are they more the protesting kind of switch voters?
Maybe one of them could stand against Bill?
R G, Green voters tend to be the more informed, thinking voters who would rather talk about policy than throwing petty insults around.
Green voters tend to be the more informed, thinking voters who would rather talk about policy than throwing petty insults around.
Or failing that bspit, deface a few National Party election hoardings?
So, bs prout, do you think if Cullen hadn't squandered the surpluses our economic picture would be brighter today? And would the hyperinflation that your Australian leader will create by printing money cure all the woes you have listed above?
Roy
Morgan
@bsprout
Any chance you could provide a link to who stood in Clutha Southland in 2008?
Here you go RG Dick:
http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2008/electorate-6.html
It was me, Mr Dick. I stood against Bill English and I have to say, i was a very poor candidate indeed - nervous, tongue-tied, shabbily dressed - an embarrassment to every Southlander really. I was booed off the platform at every meeting, mostly because of my total lack of knowledge on anything at all, but in part because of my stuttering, incoherent delivery. Bill kindly suggested that he speak on my behalf, put forward the Green Plan in my stead, which was kind, but I persisted, stumbling through my boring speech - women tore out their hair, babies possetted, grown men renounced the demon drink - it was appalling what I did to the long-suffering Southland public. Even today, the jeers of those good folk ring in my ears. Would I do it again? In a trice! Encouraged by your keen interest in my every utterrence, I sense that my time has at last come and that New Zealand needs to hear more from me! I got off to a shaky start, it's true, and getting only the two votes was a setback to my confidence, but I feel certain I could double that, knowing that you, Mr Dick, are in Southland, one of my constituents and, if I may make so bold, supporters, and you'll probably have a friend, maybe two, and together with my pair of staunch supporters, we can just about lever me into a seat of power, alongside of the PM, Russel Norman, and Education Minister, Dave Kennedy.
You're like a breath of fresh air for me, Mr Dick. To think, I thought I was all washed up!
To the billboard makers I go!
Many, many thanks.
Keeping Stock - It's terribly presumptuous I know, but you might be secretly interested to listen to our (Robyn's an my) weekly radio show, Get Down to Earth, if only to hear Robyn talk about the orchard project and other 'earthy' things. In case you are tempted, here's the link to the podcast.
http://www.radiosouthland.org.nz/podcasts/ENVIROPROG.mp3
Naturally, I won't pester you further about these issues, now that I've had a bit of a burst on your blog.
Thanks, KS, for the link to the 2008 Clutha-Southland result.
My tongue-in-cheek reference to the 2008 possibly being a chump was that sometimes substandard candidates one election overvalue the next candidate for the same Party.
Although Robert Guyton clearly believed a "chump" candidate could only be him, he appears to have allowed his ego to trump facts. Although I bow to his superior intellect, and certainly would not dispute his own description of his campaign, the link suggests that he may have registered under another name. While we might consider such an action unprincipled, I accept that the Candidate's chances would be enhanced.
I am surprised to see Robert Guyton is still around. I thought he might have joined the brain drain to Australia (but then again, maybe not).
Here are the results from your link, KS. Thanks again.
Official Count Results -- Clutha-Southland
This is not the formal declaration of results.
The Chief Electoral Officer declares the results of the official count by publishing a notice in the NZ Gazette.
Electorate Number: 6 Final: Yes
Polling Places Counted: 89 of 89 (100.0%) Votes Counted: 33,941
Winning Candidate: ENGLISH, Bill (NAT) Majority: 15,475
Parties Candidates
National Party 20,235 ENGLISH, Bill NAT 22,631
Green Party 1,726 GOW, Tim GP 2,304
ACT New Zealand 1,315 HENDERSON, Roly ACT 590
Alliance 63 HUBBARD, Marvin ALL 149
Labour Party 8,091 PRYDE, Don LAB 7,156
Family Party 193 TANKARD, Paul FAM 515
Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party 131
Democrats for Social Credit 18
Jim Anderton's Progressive 226
Kiwi Party 131
Libertarianz 16
Māori Party 141
New Zealand First Party 968
New Zealand Pacific Party 8
RAM - Residents Action Movement 4
The Bill and Ben Party 259
The Republic of New Zealand Party 2
United Future 254
Workers Party 18
Party Informals 142 Candidate Informals 354
TOTAL 33,941 TOTAL 33,699
The results for Labour and the Greens in 2008 and 20011 are:
2008
Green Party 1,726 GOW, Tim GP 2,304
Labour Party 8,091 PRYDE, Don LAB 7,156
2011
Green Party 2,751 GOLDSMITH, Rachael GP 2,633
Labour Party 5,160 LOO, Tat LAB 5,207
The Green vote "nearly doubled" up about 60%) and Rachael's candidate total up by about 15%, although below the Party vote. Labour's Party vote and Candidate vote have both bled significantly. Protest voting perhaps?
Robert is confused again; he must have been into the berries early this morning. It was 2005 when he stood against Bill English, running up the massive total of 808 candidate votes and 719 party votes for the Greens.
http://electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2005/electorate-8.html
And thanks for the podcast link Robert - I'll have a listen, as I will be trying to get into the orchard this weekend, weather permitting. The blossom is fast turning into fresh green leaves, and I harvested a huge bag of lemons yesterday off a tree that's less than a metre high!
Ha! True! Not me after all.
My results were still poor, I stand by that.
Tim's no chump. He's a farmer and a very independent one at that.
He has sound ideas on pasture management and stock selection that would benefit the Southland beef and sheep farmer, should they care to take a close look at how he manages his farm.
And KS, you've given me citrus-envy!
My infinitely better half is making noises about making a big batch of lemon curd Robert, so there might be a lemon meringue pie in my future!
And me, to far away for you to post one. That's just cruel, KS.
(My mind's eye sees me getting one of those pies in the face - my imagination must be playing tricks on me. Must stop responding - I'll wear out my temporary welcome.)
Make sure you tune in tomorrow morning bsprout; just after six am; you'll be impressed!
Post a Comment