Monday, October 1, 2012

Grand Final or the Hunger Games?

The showpiece of the NRL took place last night, but the sporting contest has been overshadowed by controversy. Bulldogs forward James Graham is on report after having allegedly bitten Storm fullback Billy Slater midway through the first half of the match; Brad Walter from the SMH reports:

ANGRY Storm players demanded to know why Canterbury forward James Graham wasn't sent off in yesterday's grand final over an alleged bite that drew blood from Billy Slater's left ear.
Slater had two small marks near the top of his ear where the bleeding had been coming from when interviewed in the dressing room and Graham is expected to face a suspension of more than eight matches if found guilty of biting.
However, Melbourne players questioned referee Tony Archer about why Graham was only placed on report over the 26th-minute incident and allowed to play a starring role for the Bulldogs in the 14-4 loss.
Players and officials from both sides were reluctant to comment on the allegations after the match but Storm captain Cameron Smith confirmed he had asked Archer why Graham was not sent off.
''I spoke to the referee about it and Tony explained it to me,'' Smith said. ''We can't control what the referee's decisions are so we just played on.''
Asked what Slater had said on the field, Smith said: ''Bill came to me and said that he felt that he was bitten. That was what he felt.''
Video replays appeared to support Slater's accusation and Archer said blood could be seen coming from Slater's ear. Smith told Archer: ''The last player that bit someone got 18 weeks.''
However, Graham was saved the ignominy of being the first player given his marching orders in a grand final since Canterbury's Phil Sigsworth in 1986.
After being questioned about the decision by Slater and Smith, Archer told them: ''The incident is on report. That is all I can do. I haven't got enough evidence.''
Smith said last night he accepted Archer's explanation, while Slater repeatedly offered ''no comment'' when asked about the incident.
However, when asked on the field if he wanted to make a formal complaint against Graham, Slater said: ''F---ing oath. He bit me.''
Archer then said to fellow referee Ben Cummins: ''You see the incident, you see the blood on the ear, everyone has seen that. That incident is on report.''
Graham did not react as he stood with Bulldogs captain Michael Ennis listening to Archer.
Canterbury coach Des Hasler and Ennis refused to comment on the issue but a Bulldogs insider said teammates were shocked as it is considered out of character for Graham. The Bulldogs believe the Englishman, who has now played in seven successive grand finals in Super League and the NRL, was caught up in the heat of the moment and had a ''brain explosion''.

Judge the incident for yourself:


 

It was indeed a brain explosion from Graham, and based on the video evidence, and the blood on Slater's ear, Graham has an uphill job to avoid a lengthy (and deserved, if the allegation is proven) suspension.

There is no place for biting in any sport. This was a rugby league match, not the Hunger Games. Sure; emotions were running high, but professional sportsmen should have sufficient self-control to not get involved in incidents such as this.

Melbourne's victory last night after having two titles stripped due to salary cap breaches was sweet. But it is unfortunate that both the match and Melbourne's victory are going to be remembered for all the wrong reasons.

No comments: