Tuesday, October 16, 2012

The Herald calls out Shearer

Parliament resumes this afternoon after the school holiday recess. And whilst all eyes will be on John Key as he seeks leave to correct an answer about Kim Dotcom and the GCSB, David Shearer is under as much if not more scrutiny.

That hasn't escaped the leader writer at the Herald who opines:

Labour leader David Shearer must be wishing he had never mentioned a recording of a remark the Prime Minister is said to have made to staff of the Government Communications Security Bureau in February about the Dotcom investigation. If any recording was made of John Key's visit to the agency that day, Mr Shearer does not have a copy of it, nor it seems does anybody else.
In a sense, it does not matter, Mr Key freely concedes he might have made the remark but cannot recall it. He says the Dotcom case was not on his mind in February. Today, he needs to assure Parliament he did not mislead it when he said he did not know until September that the GCSB had gone outside its brief to monitor Dotcom, who has New Zealand residency. But in the absence of a recording he will be able to turn defence into an attack on the Opposition Leader's credibility.
If the public finds the exchange tiresome it is because it sees clearly what has happened: the Prime Minister has not paid enough attention to the Dotcom case and the Opposition Leader is not a natural muck-raker. Mr Shearer's deficiency, if it can be called that, presents him with the greater problem.
Labour needs him to make a public impact. He has tried the high road, getting out around the country to talk about real issues, but that made little impression on the polls. Now he is resorting to parliamentary point-scoring, which seldom moves the public but can lift his MPs' morale if done well.
They cannot be impressed by his miscue on the GCSB. But even if his tactics had been more adroit, it is doubtful that the issue would have given him a lift in the polls. Mr Shearer does not seem at ease in this sort of politics. It appears to be an effort for him to take an interest in the intricacies of the Dotcom saga and attack it with conviction.
He would be well advised to leave this sort of work to others in his team who are more naturally tenacious than he is. Leaders have to be true to themselves to command the respect of others.
Mr Shearer looked best last week at centre stage in an economic policy "summit" with fellow Opposition party leaders flanking him. Unfortunately for him, that effort was overwhelmed by the missing GCSB recording. If he has to fight on this level, he will not win.

When the leader writer says that "He would be well advised to leave this sort of work to others in his team who are more naturally tenacious than he is." we can only conclude that the Herald is referring to Labour's resident flinger of muck and strategic genius Trevor Mallard.

The MP for Hutt South has a long history of making unsubstantiated allegations and smears. His "chinless scarf-wearers" jibe at members of the Exclusive Brethren was not the high point of his career (by his own admission), and he has yet to find the "American bag-man" allegedly collecting donations for National some years ago. 

David Shearer is far less confrontational, and more of the Bill Rowling or Jack Marshall mode. But it was he who chose to reveal leaks from the GCSB into the public domain, and he now needs to put up or shut up. It is not good enough for Shearer to make allegations which cannot be substantiated, and his own credibility is now on the line as well.

When David Shearer was elected as leader of the Labour Party he pledged not to get involved in "gotcha" politics. He should have stuck to that; this current situation does him no credit whatsoever, and his Labour colleagues have not exactly been forthcoming in their support. David Shearer is looking increasingly like a lonesome leader.

22 comments:

Khon Ghee said...

If Shearer produces a video, I'll laugh my arse off - here!

jabba said...

Khon Ghee .. why, Key has already stated that he may have made an off hand comment but as it was 8 months ago, can't recall.
The only people worried should be Shearer/Mold and a few present or former spooks.
the other thing is that 99% of the public couldn't care less .. we are so over Dotcom that it is now boring

spot the muppet said...

@ Khon Ghee

I think that part of your anatomy has been handed back to you on a plate before today.

Khon Ghee said...

jabba - you are commenting on Dotcom. You still care.

StM - I dismiss the comments of the dishonest.

Keeping Stock said...

So where is the video to which you referred Khon Ghee? Oh dear; it doesn't exist.

David Shearer's informant told Fran Mold that there was a camera in the room, but no-one realised that it wasn't going; what a balls-up. It's time for an apology from Shearer for accusing GCSB of deleting something that never existed.

Khon Ghee said...

The camera wasn't turned on then.
Did Key joke about Dotcom during that meeting, KS?
You know he did.
If so, he knew about Dotcom, though he claims he couldn't recall. He's either telling lies of is not suitable for the position of PM.
Which do you think it is, KS?

jabba said...

"Did Key joke about Dotcom during that meeting, KS?
You know he did".

goodness KS, Khon suggests you were there, you kept that quiet

Keeping Stock said...

Yep jabba; my cover's been blown. I am really a GCSB agent who blogs solely to see what Southland Green Party supporters are up to...

Keeping Stock said...

Sorry about that Chief...

O.Yair said...

2005

Khon Ghee said...

Which do you think it is, KS?

To afraid to answer that, I see.

Courageous.

spot the muppet said...

Shearer looked so shifty on TV1 News.
Cunliffe and Jones washing their hands of the matter.
Don't thing Khon Ghee's anatomy has been reattached anyway.
What a bummer.

Keeping Stock said...

@ Key may well have joked about Dotcom Khon Ghee; after all Dotcom had been in the news for over a month by 29 February. But joking about the GCSB's involvement in the case is another matter again.

But where's the video? There isn't one, nor were any hard drives erased. David Shearer owes the GCSB an unconditional apology, because he has repeatedly stated that either there was a video or videos have been deleted without having any proof. He has been hung out to dry by his caucus colleagues.

Keeping Stock said...

PS Khon Ghee - accusations of cowardice are likely to lead to you being unwelcome here.

Khon Ghee said...

Read this, suckers!
"The Prime Minister has this afternoon dropped a bombshell in Parliament over the briefing he had with his spies on February 29….

Key told Parliament the talking point at the presentation included a short reference to the Dotcom arrest as an example of co-operation between the GCSB and the police.

Key also said a still camera that was used to take photos during his visit probably did have the capacity to record video, but it wasn’t used for that."

Shearer is correct. Key is being deceitful. Those who steadfastly refuse to look at the issue with an open mind, will never see this.
That's you guys, btw.

Did Key mention Dotcom at the briefing, KS?
The fact that he did, makes a mockey of his earlier claims that he 'couldn't remember', 'didn't know'. Only fools would swallow that.
Any fools here?

Not so casual observer said...

KS, you may need to consult DPF as to how unwelcome village idiots are kept at bay.
Honour may be insufficient.

Sherie said...

Why are 'village idiots' unwelcome here?

Keeping Stock said...

@ Not so casual observer - DPF can run his blog as he pleases, and I'll do my thing. Khon (who has only appeared here today, as Khon anyway) is on notice. He COULD be Edward the Confessor and Judge Holden, both of whom are banned, but that is just speculation on my part :)

Khon Ghee said...

So John Key did talk about Kim Dotcom at the cafeteria meeting and did discuss the GCSB's involvement. He admitted this in Parliament today, despite having been 'unable' to recall anything about it when first asked.
Can anyone seriously believe that the Prime Minister could have let those things slip his mind? No sensible, honest person could. Was Key fudging the issue, dodging the simple question, avoiding stating the obvious? Yes. It's very plain to see. Is Shearer right to call Key on his honesty? Yes.
Did Shearer muck up the process and flounder about in trying to pin Key? Yes. Is Key innocent of the charges from Peters, Mallard and Shearer? No, he's guilty. Are you here simply crowing that Key is clever and impossible to pin down? Yes. Is Key being dishonest around this issue? Yes.
It's as simple as that.

Keeping Stock said...

Key admitted nothing of the sort Khon, as you well know. I'm starting to think that you might be Winston Peters, with time on your hands this afternoon. Here's what Key said:

Mr Key is Minister responsible for the GCSB and said his response in Parliament was based on his recollection and was shared by the director of the GCSB.

"A subsequent review of all the information held by the GCSB found that on February 29, I viewed a presentation that was not related to the Dotcom file, during a visit to the bureau,'' he said.

"I am advised that the talking points to the presentation included a short reference to the Dotcom arrest as an example of co-operation between the bureau and the police.''

He said the cover slide used during the February 29 presentation was a montage of 11 still images, one of Dotcom.

"Neither the presentation nor the talking points were provided to me in hard copy.

"Neither the director of the GCSB or me recall the reference to the Dotcom matter during the visit, but I accept that well have been made.

"I wish to make it clear that I was not informed by the GCSB on its role in the Dotcom matter, nor any issues of potential illegality until Monday, 17th September,'' he said.

S. Gourlie said...

Here's what you asked for, Keeping Stock: Proof that John Key lies:

""Key’s just straight up lying to the media now on easily verifiable facts. A 3news poll shows 57% said Parliament got it wrong keeping the drinking age at 18%. Key says: “That’s one of the reasons I voted for it to go to 20 – in line with what the public thought – but Parliament didn’t vote that one.” In reality, he voted split age and, when that was knocked out, to keep it 18."

S.G. said...

So what about that 'mis-speak' then, keeping Stock? How could key, with so many questions over the accuracy of his statements, make such a blunder? he's tried to explain it away but you know he's splitting hairs to avoid the obvious conclusion that he and the truth are only occasional aquaintances.