So we were rather surprised to read his stinging criticism of the role of the EPMU in the Pike River mine disaster; under the heading How "modern unionism" failed the Pike River miners he opines:
When the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Pike River mining disaster issued its report this week, the response of the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) was immediate. It issued a press statement welcoming the report and is encouraging the Government to implement the recommended changes as soon as possible.
The statement quoted EPMU assistant national secretary Ged O’Connell who declared that report should mark a turning point for mine safety in New Zealand.
This report is a damning indictment of New Zealand’s deregulated health and safety regime. Pike River Coal Ltd should never have been allowed to operate in the way it did, and in other countries it wouldn’t have been allowed to.
The report makes clear that the tragic loss of life at Pike River could have been prevented with stronger regulations, an independent and well-resourced mine safety inspectorate and genuine worker involvement in health and safety.
We hope the failings exposed in this report spell the end of the deregulated health and safety regime of the last 20 years. This vindicates the union’s repeated calls for improvements in mine safety and for the reintroduction of check inspectors. This statement represents a complete change of heart by the EPMU officialdom for it was never critical of Pike River Coal (PRC) during the time that the mine was open. The EPMU represented approximately half of the 140 miners on the site.
This is extraordinary stuff, suggesting that the EPMU has 20/20 hindsight but somewhat less foresight. And Cowan does not exempt for former general secretary of the EPMU from his criticism; read on:
After the first explosion the EPMU strongly defended the management of PRC.
EPMU National secretary Andrew Little (now a Labour MP) told the New Zealand Herald on November 22 2010 that there was 'nothing unusual about Pike River or this mine that we’ve been particularly concerned about'.
He then appeared on TVNZ's Close Up to again defend PRC management.
He told Close Up that underground mining was inherently unsafe and the risk of gas explosions, particularly on the West Coast, was high.
While the industry was aware of the risks and took the necessary precautions, unfortunately these kinds of incidents still happened, he argued.
On November 26, 2010 the Dominion Post ran an article that denounced 'wild' rumours that the mine was not safe. It declared that “Any suggestion of obvious or known safety lapses does not find traction with unionised staff or union leader Andrew Little.'
Andrew Little's conciliatory views toward PRC management were echoed by Labour MP Damien O'Connor. He suggested that no one was responsible for the accident and that the disaster was ‘just one of these things that the West Coast unfortunately has had to get used to over the years’.
Little and O'Connor's views would of found favour with the Minister for Energy and Resources , Gerry Brownlee. He insisted that PRC had ‘an absolute focus on health and safety’.
So here we had the Government , the Labour Party and the EPMU all lining up to defend the management of PRC.
Regular readers will probably be aware that prior to embarking on self-employment, we were a card-carrying member of the EPMU for a couple of years. Our representative from the EPMU was stereotypical; large, loud and bitterly critical of bosses when speaking to the members. He was however far more lamb-like when it came to negotiating with said bosses, and in our time as a union member, there were few gains for the members.
It's easy to be wise after the event, and after the Royal Commission has issued a scathing report. But where was the EPMU's concern for its members in the lead-up to the Pike River disater, and in its immediate aftermath. Where was the EPMU's thunderous outrage then?
There are undoubtably lessons to be learned from the tragedy at Pike River in November 2010. But the EPMU's outrage now ought not exempt it from criticism for its earlier inaction or apathy. We'll leave the last word to Steven Cowan:
The views of Andrew Little and the EPMU flew in the face of expert opinion.
While Andrew Little was defending PRC an Australian gas drainage engineer, who wished to remain anonymous because he feared 'recriminations', said he visited Pike River in 2009 and observed that its operating standards were 'extremely poor'.
He said that he had been told by miners that the mine was flooded with methane gas about three weeks before the first explosion.
He said miners had bored through 'high flow methane holes' without any risk assessment conducted or procedure on how to manage gas flow from the hole in place. He was critical that PRC has not yet implemented a gas drainage drilling regime that could relieve the pressure when there was a build up of gas by drilling a hole in the coal seam.
The New Zealand Herald, also in November 2010, quoted Gerry Morris of Greymouth, a former writer for Coal magazine, who said he had 'heard regularly' from contractors at the mine 'over the last two or three years that this mine is unsafe, there’s far too much gas, there’s going to be a disaster here one day'.
But despite the overwhelming evidence that there was something seriously and dangerously wrong at the Pike Rive rnine, the officials of the EPMU did nothing.
The mine opened in November 2008 and on not one occasion did the EPMU initiate industrial action or even criticise PRC'S safety standards, even after a group of workers walked off the job to protest the lack of basic emergency equipment.
The walk out by miners was revealed by miner Brent Forrester. He told TVNZ’s Sunday on December 5 2010 that he once helped organise a walkout of about 10 miners to protest the lack of basic emergency equipment, including stretchers and an emergency transport vehicle. They received no support from the EPMU . Andrew Little even insisted that PRC ' had a good health and safety committee that’s been very active.'
It was exactly this benevolent attitude by the EPMU that allowed PRC - and the Department of Labour - to continue as if it was just 'business a usual'. It appears that no-one was protecting the interests and concerns of the workers on the mining site. The EMPU failed to organise industrial action to address safety concerns at the mine in favour of 'cooperating' with management, what it and the CTU sometimes refer to as 'modern unionism'. There won't be any resignations from within the EPMU for dereliction of duty and, of course, Andrew Little has escaped to Parliament.